I have a love hate relationship with Le Pergole Torte. I’ve purchased this wine twice in my life, both during the excellent vintages of 1997 and 2010. Given the price of the wine, I never seek it out in less than optimal vintages. However, vintage character doesn’t seem to matter much for this estate.
A few years ago I came across a bottle at a reputable shop where the knuckle head purveyor loves nothing but 100% terroir driven wines that show little to no oak influence. I have interacted with him before. I should have known. He offered me a great deal on this bottle and said “you’ll love it, it tastes like the dirt where it was grown.” Right then and there I should have run away. But I remembered how the 1997 blossomed after 20! years of aging. I paid my $65 and knew I needed to bury this deep in the Euro Cave.
Fast forward until this weekend. I hadn’t recalled that the 1997 took 20 years to come around. I’d been staring at this bottle for 7 or 8 years and decided the 10 year mark should be sufficient. After all, the wine spends only 2 years in oak and one of those is French barrique. I’ll decant it for an hour and my charred ribeye will help it along. I should have saved my $65.
Now, perhaps the absence of founder Sergio Manetti has become a variable in this equation. Perhaps it’s the targeted style of the winery, which I have described in the past as “understated and restrained elegance.” Whatever the reason, I’m not on board. The ship can depart and I am happy to wave arrivederci from the docks.
I mean, this isn’t geothermal irrigation or differential calculus. It’s wine. It’s 100% Sangiovese that is aged for 1 year in Slavonian Botte and 1 year in French barrique. Hundreds of winemakers master this formula. Ask any of them and they’ll tell you that good wines start in the vineyard. You know what? So do bad ones.
The 2010 Montevertine Le Pergole Torte is a pretty violet color throughout with a copper rim at the edge of the bowl. Immediately upon opening this was thin, tart and essentially insipid. Fine. After an hour in the decanter, aromas of red fruits, mulch and sandalwood began to emerge. Meh.
In the mouth, the wine tastes like dirt. Tart dirt. There’s little depth or nuance. No intensity and no length. The mid-palate is hollow and light with thin red fruits masked by slightly bitter, stemmy tannins. I don’t get it. And I’m done trying. 84 points. Find this wine.
If you have a different experience with this wine I’d love to hear about it in the Comments Section. Maybe some day I’ll taste this again. But it will need to arrive as a sample or on someone else’s dime; especially at the ridiculous price this wine commands today.
Salute!
I really like your upfront honesty, John. I’ve never tasted any wines from this winery but I know they are very expensive. I’m making a note. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and perspective.
Thanks Peter – my unbiased opinion in how I write is the ONLY thing that makes a writer relevant. I can’t do it any other way and the day that happens is the day I shut this site down. So thank you! As for this, you’re right. For $130-$150 there are a lots of pure Sangiovese options that exalt the grape better and do so way sooner than 15-20 years. Cheers!
So, a somm I respect a lot mentioned Le Pergole Torte as a really excellent wine. My wife bought a bottle as a Christmas gift. We drank it and it was …………. perfectly ordinary. By no means was it ‘bad’, it was just entirely forgettable. I’ve wondered since if I’m the only person not ‘getting it’ and now I know I’m not. Sometimes in wine world reputations exceed actual product, I guess.
What vintage and how old was it Steve?
Don’t recall and not particularly. Cellaring isn’t what we do best.
I have steered away from these in recent years due to price escalation. Prior to that though, my experience with this wine was always very positive. The last vintage I recall was the 2006 and at the time of consumption it was a stellar example of the varietal and region.
All that said, I lean heavy to classically styled Italian wine.