In and around the quiet village of Montalcino, there is an undercurrent of discussion – in trattorias, bars and enotecas. You hear it often whispered in hushed tones and quieted sentiments of “you didn’t hear it from me”, but it’s hanging around like the 800 pound Cinghiale in the room. There is a rising discourse to divide the Brunello zone into several separate subzones and depending upon who you speak to this would be the best thing in last 20 years for Brunello, or an unmitigated disaster in waiting. In short, producers are divided over division.
The Brunello Zone extends over almost 24,000 hectares, of which a mere 2,100 are under vine. 24,000 hectares is about 100 square miles, or just slightly larger than three times the island of Manhattan.
The highest elevation in the zone is principally centered around the village of Montalcino itself. The wines produced closer to this area are naturally, stylistically different from those produced in other parts of the zone.
Many producers argue that this is among the first reasons to subzone. To help the consumers understand the subtle differences between the many wine styles. To allow delineated subzones to become associated with certain styles of Brunello so that the consumer knows what to expect when selecting a wine. As an educated writer and consumer, I’m not convinced.
Roberto Terzuoli, proprietor and winemaker at Sasso di Sole told me of a completely different, non-consumer related reason to support sub-zoning. Sasso di Sole is a small estate with only a few acres of vineyards. Direct to consumer, so called “Cellar Door” sales, are crucial to his survival. Any subzoning project would also come with a detailed, government funded, Consorzio sponsored, mapping of the entire zone. “With wineries accurately identified on a map, consumers will be better able to locate small wineries. Terzuoli says, the area is vast and confusing, even locals get lost.”
These may be the obvious reasons to subzone or they may be the hidden red-herrings. Like many debates, there is also an undercurrent of hushed politics that permeates the discussion. There’s a North-South divide that is somehow manifested in a debate over styles. Many of the original Brunello producers are located very close to the town of Montalcino. They have a sense of pride, of purpose, that the Brunello they create is the original. That their wines are “true” Brunello. But is that accurate and will it really assist consumers? Let’s look at Brunello’s northerly sibling, the Chianti zone, for an analogy about the veracity of the supposition.
The Chianti DOCG is a large parcel of land that encompasses six separate sub-zones. In essence, it’s what Brunello is using as a general model. Within the center of Chianti, is the delimited “Classico” zone. Over the years, the “Classico” designation has been important for the brand and for the wines bearing the zone name. It’s a geographic area that has been denoted as an exceptional place to produce Chianti because the soil, climate, and exposition of the vineyards are thought to be ideal. In short, perfect terroir.
If that were the end of the equation, then such a designation would be very meaningful. However, when you factor in variables like human intervention (when to harvest) vineyard management (pruning, green harvesting, canopy management) winemaking styles (cement, stainless steel, French barrique, large casks, new oak, used oak) and not the least of which the grapes in the blend (100% Sangiovese or blends including Canaiolo, Malvasia Nera, Colorino, or even Merlot and Cabernet) then what does “Classico” mean? The average consumer will typically have no idea about any of this because none of it is required to be disclosed on labels. It’s simply a matter of knowledge. Wine geeks know. The average consumer doesn’t. Does the average consumer differentiate the Chianti Classico wines among the six other subzones of Chianti? Ask around in your local wine shop and you’ll quickly see.
But let’s get back to Brunello. With the exception of the blending issue, because Brunello by law must be 100% Sangiovese, all the other variables that exist for Chianti will exist in sub-zoning Brunello. And dirt is just the start! Recently, a group of independent producers mapped the various soil types that exist in Brunello and they’ve come up with 8 distinct but broad categories – many of which are combinations of each other. Now factor in altitudes, varying clones of Sangiovese and the way they behave and grow in different soils and you’ve just scratched the surface.
It’s been suggested that the creation of a “Brunello Classico” area – wines coming from the center of the zone, very near the town of Montalcino itself, might be the first step in a broader sub-zoning project. One look at the Chianti Classico analogy should be enough to convince them of the folly in that.
|~ Fortezza Montalcino ~|
The more I spoke to winemakers, the more I heard about highlighting the differences of the terroir. It’s a valid point. I sat down over a glass of Brunello with Francesco Cinzano of the venerable producer, Col d’Orcia. I first asked him straight away, is your estate in favor of sub-dividing the zone?
“Yes, very much in favor of starting the work on this long overdue subject of recognizing the great many differences between the vineyards of Montalcino. The facts speak for themselves, he told me. The height over sea level of the Montalcino vineyards goes from 300 feet, to over 1,800 feet. The soil conditions vary from sandy former sea beds rich in fossils to heavy clay. The climatic conditions go from dry Mediterranean, very much influenced by coastal winds, to Continental with morning fog. As an example, you can take the Official Consorzio data at harvest from October 1, 2013. In the Canalicchio Zone, Sangiovese was still below 12.5% alcohol – still a couple of weeks from picking while in Tavernelle, the alcohol was at 14.% and quite ready for harvest.”
“It’s mostly recognizing the reality and bringing all the producers together behind a common product. Informing consumers as to the great diversity that can be found in Montalcino. And when I say recognizing the reality, I also refer to the rule in the disciplinare of Brunello that allows producers to name their Brunello after the vineyard where it is produced. The “Vigna” denomination recognizes single vineyards and is really a starting point of zoning.”
So what’s the problem then? What’s standing in the way of making this happen? Is there resistance from wineries that fear that as a result of zoning they’ll be looked upon as a “lesser” Brunello if they’re in a “lesser” zone?
“Giovanni, I think it’s ignorance mostly, along with prejudice and politics. Concerning lesser zones, it is common knowledge in Montalcino that the heavier soils of the north east are considered more difficult from an agronomic point of view. Well, that is the area where Casanova di Neri is located and his wine had the highest ever rating for a Brunello. There is no lesser zone in Montalcino.”
|~ Il Palazzone’s Due Porte Vineyard: One of three vineyards from which they source fruit for their Brunello. The three vineyards are scattered about the appellation ~|
Andrea Machetti of Mastrojanni agreed as well; that the issue is important and needs to be addressed and resolved. However, he stopped short of a full throated desire to see sub-zoning become reality.
“Mastrojanni are members of the Consorzio del Brunello di Montalcino and the Consorzio is to start a study comparing composition of different soils to different altitudes, longitudes and latitudes in order to map the whole area of the hill of Montalcino. A study that in our opinion will give a definitive view of subzoning.”
Not everyone necessarily agrees. When I spoke to Laura Gray and Marco Sassetti of Il Palazzone they viewed the issue as very complex and wondered if it could be resolved in a manner that would assist or confuse the consumer.
The issue of producers who own vineyards scattered throughout the zone cannot be underestimated when they ultimately blend all of their fruit to produce one wine. In fact, many producers prefer to blend fruit in this manner because it gives a wine that is more representative of the overall Brunello terroir.
|~ Vineyards at La Fiorita’s Estate near Castelnuovo del’Abate. La Fiorita owns vineyards in two separate parts of the zone and they blend both terroir to produce a singular expression of Brunello ~|
And perhaps one of the most significant issues of all, that no one seemingly mentioned, is that Brunello is an international brand. Consumers the world over want a certain degree of expectation to be realized when they buy a bottle of “Brunello di Montalcino”. From China to Russia to the United States and at all points between, the Brunello brand is a significant asset that should not be risked by creating a myriad of identities that consumers will need to understand.
It’s easy to imagine how difficult it may be for a winery to label their Brunello if they own vineyards in 2 or 3 suggested sub-zones. Which do they choose? It’s conversely very easy to imagine the trepidation a producer may feel by being forced to label their wine simply as “Brunello” when others are seemingly using more prestigious wording on their labels solely because their vineyards are located in only one zone. Is that fair? Does it matter? If you agree with Francesco Cinzano, maybe it doesn’t. Ultimately, it’s up to the wineries to communicate effectively with consumers.
Ezio Rivella, who was Castello Banfi’s Chief winemaker for almost 25 years told me simply, “Even within single parts of a smaller area, the portion of a vineyard that sits at a slightly lower altitude will give wines of deeper color that are richer in tannins than wines made from grapes from higher altitudes. Furthermore, you have to realize that a large number of producers are deliberately blending Brunello wines from different zones and varying altitudes. The reason for this is obvious. In this way they obtain more complete Brunellos than if they used grapes from a single zone only.”
|~ Poggio Alle Mura Castle at Castello Banfi ~|
So where does all this leave us? I suggest that it’s a matter that must be addressed by the Consorzio. There has to be a degree of leadership and initiative in moving the process forward; even if it comes with bruised egos, and a degree of criticism from its members that is all but certain.
The data clearly supports the notion that microclimates exist within the overall zone. Whether it’s from altitude, soil, exposition, or vine clone, ultimately that doesn’t matter. What matters most is the value of sub-zoning to Brunello. Will undertaking this complex project add a commensurate level of value to the brand that is worth the effort? Will it hurt the brand by adding confusion and creating a sense of apathy among consumers?
Perhaps the Consorzio should answer those questions first. Instead of debating the how, when and why to implement sub-zoning, they should be asking: Should we be doing it? I suspect the answer to that has more variations than the subzones being proposed.
As a somewhat final postscript to this piece, one Brunello producer that prefers their anonymity provided a unique perspective on the entire discussion. He told me…
“Italians typically don’t want to lead. They want to be lead. In this fashion, they are free to criticize the leader.”
My sincere thanks to the producers that contributed to this article.